Extreme DUI Case Results

We Help Get Your DUI Charges and Penalties Reduced or Dropped.

The criminal defense DUI lawyers at Gilbert DUI Lawyer have over 35 combined years of experience defending clients in the greater Phoenix area. We’ve helped clients receive reduced penalties, dismissed charges and flexible legal results that make it easier to move on after your case. View the recent case results below to get a better idea of how our criminal defense DUI attorneys provide first-class service to their clients.

In Arizona, DUIs are a common offense – there were more than 30,000 DUI arrests in 2019 alone. But although DUIs are common, they still hold severe penalties. First-time DUIs can include 10 days to six months in jail, license suspension, probation, ignition interlock installation, and over $3,000 in fines and surcharges. Repeat offenders can face even harsher consequences.

At Gilbert DUI Lawyer, we’ve helped many DUI clients avoid the maximum penalties in their cases.

Ms. B was in a lot of trouble when she came to Gilbert DUI Lawyer for help. Unfortunately for her, she had just been convicted at trial for DUI with another defense attorney. Ms. B wanted her conviction overturned and her case dismissed. Gilbert DUI Lawyer had an uphill battle, but was excited for the challenge.

First, our criminal defense team filed an appeal to have Ms. B’s conviction overturned based on evidence presented at trial which we believed prejudiced Ms. B. Despite the prosecutor’s fervent responses to deny our request, the Court sided with Gilbert DUI Lawyer and overturned Ms. B’s conviction for DUI. However, this was not the end for Ms. B. The prosecutor quickly re-filed DUI charges and the case was again set for re-trial.

CASE DISMISSED - Our criminal attorneys found out that one of the key officers in Ms. B’s case was deployed and unable to attend a trial for several months. Our criminal team pressed the prosecutor hard for a dismissal based on the unavailability of witnesses. Although the prosecutor could have again continued the trial for the officer, he did not. After many months of aggressive representation, the prosecutor agreed to flat out dismiss Ms. B’s case.